GLPI vs Zoho Desk

GLPI

The one product in this comparison that shares Chalk's whole premise — free, open source, self-hostable, with a real ITIL service desk attached to a real asset inventory — and none of its K-12 model.

Where GLPI is strong

• ● Genuinely free and genuinely open: GPL-3.0 on GitHub, downloadable and self-hostable with no license fee, no crippled community edition, and two decades of production use behind it.
• ● A full ITIL service desk — tickets, problems and changes, with planning, statistics and dashboards — sitting on the same database as the asset inventory rather than integrated with it.
• ● Very broad inventory coverage: computers, monitors, software, network equipment, printers, phones, cartridges, consumables, SIM cards, cables, PDUs and datacenter infrastructure, plus a CMDB over the relationships between them.
• ● Financial management most asset trackers do not attempt — budgets, contracts, suppliers and license tracking as first-class objects, so the cost side of the estate lives with the asset side.
• ● GLPI Agent does automated inventory across platforms, so hardware and software data arrives without anyone typing serial numbers.
• ● A multi-entity model with granular profiles and access control that maps naturally onto a district of many schools, plus a large plugin ecosystem — and both deployment shapes are real and priced openly, self-hosted or hosted GLPI Network at a published per-user rate.

What to check before you buy

• The free download and the product Teclib' sells are not the same surface. OAuth SSO, SCIM, GLPI AI, the advanced dashboard and whole tiers of official plugins are bundled into paid GLPI Network subscriptions.

  Basis: Vendor pricing page lists these as contents of the Basic, Standard and Advanced subscription tiers.

• Self-hosted support starts at €100 per month even for a small installation, and the meter is IT agents — the technicians who answer tickets — with tiers stepping to €300, €1,000 and €4,500 per month.

  Basis: Vendor pricing page, self-hosted subscription tiers with per-tier agent limits.

• It is a general ITIL tool with no K-12 model: no student, guardian or enrollment concepts, and no SIS or rostering connectors — no OneRoster, Clever, ClassLink, PowerSchool, Infinite Campus or Skyward. Students arrive by import.

  Basis: Absent from GLPI's published feature set, which describes users, groups and entities rather than students.

• No 1:1 circulation machinery. GLPI can reserve and assign equipment, but there is no student device agreement, no parent e-signature, no overdue on a school-year loan, no damage fee and no family balance.

  Basis: Absent from the vendor's documented modules, which cover assets, helpdesk, CMDB and financial management.

• No ChromeOS story. Inventory comes from GLPI Agent and network scanning; Google Admin, Intune and Jamf ingest are plugin or integration territory rather than documented core modules, and there is no ChromeOS AUE surface.

  Basis: Core inventory is documented as GLPI Agent-driven; no first-party MDM connector appears in the published feature list.

• It is not an identity provider. GLPI authenticates against directories and external providers — and OAuth SSO is itself a subscription plugin — rather than issuing SAML or OIDC to your other vendors.

  Basis: Vendor pricing page lists OAuth SSO and SCIM as plugins included with paid subscriptions, positioning GLPI as the consumer of identity.

• Self-hosting GLPI is a PHP and database deployment plus agent rollout that you patch and upgrade yourself, unless you buy a subscription or engage a partner. That is a real operations line, not a download.

  Basis: GLPI is distributed as a PHP application released on GitHub with a separately versioned GLPI Agent; the vendor routes implementation through its partner network.

• Pricing, documentation and support are anchored to a European vendor and priced in euros, so a US district is usually buying implementation through a partner rather than from the vendor directly.

  Basis: Vendor site publishes euro pricing and directs implementation to its Platinum Partner network.

How Chalk compares with GLPI →

Zoho Desk

One of the cheapest real help desks you can buy — and the wrong product in Zoho's own catalog for a district that needs to track devices.

Where Zoho Desk is strong

• ● The lowest published entry price of any mature help desk here, with a permanently free three-agent tier and no trial clock on it.
• ● Broad channel coverage for the money — email, web forms, self-service help center, community forums, instant messaging including WhatsApp, social, telephony, and live chat at the top tier.
• ● Blueprints, Zoho's visual process builder, let a small team encode a real approval or escalation flow without code — a genuinely strong feature at this price.
• ● Zia AI for sentiment, tagging, and reply assistance, plus 30-plus built-in reports and 10-plus dashboards out of the box.
• ● A well-documented REST API, an extensions framework, and mobile apps for agents; Zoho claims integration with 360-plus applications.
• ● Ten regional data centers with residency chosen at signup, which is a real answer for a district with a data-location clause in board policy.

What to check before you buy

• Zoho Desk has no IT asset management, no device inventory, and no CMDB. It is customer-service software; the only inventory-adjacent integration is Zoho Inventory, a commerce stock product for sales orders and shipments.

  Basis: Zoho's Desk features and integrations pages contain no ITAM, inventory, or CMDB capability; Zoho Inventory is listed as a separate commerce application.

• The IT product from Zoho Corporation is ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus, sold by a different division with its own pricing and its own on-premises option. Buying Zoho Desk for a district IT department means buying the customer-service half of the catalog.

  Basis: ManageEngine describes itself as 'the enterprise IT management division of Zoho Corp'; ServiceDesk Plus combines ITSM, ITAM, and CMDB and is available on-premises and in the cloud.

• No SIS or rostering integration — no OneRoster, Clever, ClassLink, PowerSchool, Infinite Campus, or Skyward — and no student, guardian, or family data model. The entities are contacts, accounts, and tickets.

  Basis: Zoho Desk's published integrations page lists Zoho apps, telephony partners, and general business tools only, with no SIS among them. Verified against the published integrations page rather than an exhaustive crawl of the extension marketplace.

• No 1:1 device custody of any kind: no check-out to a student, no due dates, no overdue handling, no parent-signed agreement, no loaner pool, no lost or stolen lifecycle, and no damage fees.

  Basis: Absent from every Zoho Desk feature page; the product has no asset primitive to attach custody to.

• The features districts assume are standard sit several tiers up. Knowledge base requires Standard, multi-department and Zia require Professional, and live chat requires Enterprise at $40.

  Basis: Zoho's published plan comparison on the Desk pricing page.

• No education page and no published education discount for Zoho Desk. Zoho's nonprofit program exists but its eligibility is written around trusts, societies, and registered nonprofits rather than public school districts.

  Basis: The URL a district would expect for a Zoho Desk education page returns 404, and the nonprofit program page does not list educational institutions among qualifying organizations. Do not read this as 'no US program exists' — read it as nothing published that names schools.

• Zoho Desk is not an identity provider. Single sign-on for third-party applications comes from Zoho Directory, a separate product with its own tiers, whose free plan covers three applications.

  Basis: Zoho Directory is marketed and priced separately as a workforce identity and access management platform; Zoho Desk's own material describes no IdP capability.

• Cloud-only. There is no on-premises Zoho Desk, which is a sharper contrast than usual because the same parent company does ship an on-premises service desk under the ManageEngine brand.

  Basis: No on-premises edition appears on any Zoho Desk page; ManageEngine's ServiceDesk Plus page advertises on-premises deployment explicitly.

How Chalk compares with Zoho Desk →

The third option: Chalk

If you are weighing GLPI against Zoho Desk, Chalk belongs on the same shortlist. It is the open-source K-12 IT stack: device inventory that fills itself in from Google Admin, Intune, and Jamf against a roster synced from your SIS, a 1:1 circulation desk with agreements and fees, repairs with parts and costs, a help desk that already knows who is asking, and a built-in SAML/OIDC identity provider.

• ✓ Self-host it free forever under AGPL-3.0 — the entire feature set, one binary, your infrastructure — or use the hosted version, priced by fleet size with no per-seat or per-student fees and the price ladder published.
• ✓ Built only for K-12: students, buildings, custody, funding sources, and ChromeOS auto-update expiration are native concepts, not custom fields.
• ✓ Writes back to Google Admin as a reviewed diff — every OU move, disable, and deprovision previewed before it executes — and serves a OneRoster 1.1 API so other district systems can pull the roster from Chalk.
• ✓ Fees are assessed and tracked without touching payment cards, keeping the asset system out of your PCI scope.