GLPI vs One to One Plus

GLPI

The one product in this comparison that shares Chalk's whole premise — free, open source, self-hostable, with a real ITIL service desk attached to a real asset inventory — and none of its K-12 model.

Where GLPI is strong

• ● Genuinely free and genuinely open: GPL-3.0 on GitHub, downloadable and self-hostable with no license fee, no crippled community edition, and two decades of production use behind it.
• ● A full ITIL service desk — tickets, problems and changes, with planning, statistics and dashboards — sitting on the same database as the asset inventory rather than integrated with it.
• ● Very broad inventory coverage: computers, monitors, software, network equipment, printers, phones, cartridges, consumables, SIM cards, cables, PDUs and datacenter infrastructure, plus a CMDB over the relationships between them.
• ● Financial management most asset trackers do not attempt — budgets, contracts, suppliers and license tracking as first-class objects, so the cost side of the estate lives with the asset side.
• ● GLPI Agent does automated inventory across platforms, so hardware and software data arrives without anyone typing serial numbers.
• ● A multi-entity model with granular profiles and access control that maps naturally onto a district of many schools, plus a large plugin ecosystem — and both deployment shapes are real and priced openly, self-hosted or hosted GLPI Network at a published per-user rate.

What to check before you buy

• The free download and the product Teclib' sells are not the same surface. OAuth SSO, SCIM, GLPI AI, the advanced dashboard and whole tiers of official plugins are bundled into paid GLPI Network subscriptions.

  Basis: Vendor pricing page lists these as contents of the Basic, Standard and Advanced subscription tiers.

• Self-hosted support starts at €100 per month even for a small installation, and the meter is IT agents — the technicians who answer tickets — with tiers stepping to €300, €1,000 and €4,500 per month.

  Basis: Vendor pricing page, self-hosted subscription tiers with per-tier agent limits.

• It is a general ITIL tool with no K-12 model: no student, guardian or enrollment concepts, and no SIS or rostering connectors — no OneRoster, Clever, ClassLink, PowerSchool, Infinite Campus or Skyward. Students arrive by import.

  Basis: Absent from GLPI's published feature set, which describes users, groups and entities rather than students.

• No 1:1 circulation machinery. GLPI can reserve and assign equipment, but there is no student device agreement, no parent e-signature, no overdue on a school-year loan, no damage fee and no family balance.

  Basis: Absent from the vendor's documented modules, which cover assets, helpdesk, CMDB and financial management.

• No ChromeOS story. Inventory comes from GLPI Agent and network scanning; Google Admin, Intune and Jamf ingest are plugin or integration territory rather than documented core modules, and there is no ChromeOS AUE surface.

  Basis: Core inventory is documented as GLPI Agent-driven; no first-party MDM connector appears in the published feature list.

• It is not an identity provider. GLPI authenticates against directories and external providers — and OAuth SSO is itself a subscription plugin — rather than issuing SAML or OIDC to your other vendors.

  Basis: Vendor pricing page lists OAuth SSO and SCIM as plugins included with paid subscriptions, positioning GLPI as the consumer of identity.

• Self-hosting GLPI is a PHP and database deployment plus agent rollout that you patch and upgrade yourself, unless you buy a subscription or engage a partner. That is a real operations line, not a download.

  Basis: GLPI is distributed as a PHP application released on GitHub with a separately versioned GLPI Agent; the vendor routes implementation through its partner network.

• Pricing, documentation and support are anchored to a European vendor and priced in euros, so a US district is usually buying implementation through a partner rather than from the vendor directly.

  Basis: Vendor site publishes euro pricing and directs implementation to its Platinum Partner network.

How Chalk compares with GLPI →

One to One Plus

A K-12 asset management and help desk platform focused on 1:1 device programs, sold as a single subscription with all core features included and an actively developed native mobile app on both iOS and Android.

Where One to One Plus is strong

• ● A genuinely strong native mobile app on both iOS and Android, using the phone camera as the scanner with no hardware sled — assignment and collection, full ticket create/update/close, photo and video damage capture, and adding or removing parts with a live availability check. It is actively developed, with Face ID login, in-ticket attachments, and mobile-only ticket forms all shipping within the last year or so.
• ● The only product in this comparison with native insurance program management: coverage applied to eligible incidents, claim status and coverage limits tracked, and approved claims offsetting invoice balances. Premiums are a charge type and insurance forms are an e-signature document type.
• ● Simple, honest packaging — one subscription, all core features, no module upsells. Among K-12 asset vendors that is genuinely uncommon and removes a whole category of procurement surprise.
• ● More than a dozen named integrations covering SIS (Infinite Campus, PowerSchool, Skyward, Ascender), MDM (Google Admin, Microsoft Intune, Mosyle, Jamf Pro, PDQ Deploy), identity (Active Directory plus Google and Microsoft SSO), and payments (MySchoolBucks, Rycor).
• ● Purpose-built end-of-year tooling: bulk turn-in for large-scale collection, cart, room, and inventory-area location granularity, and building-level audit reconciliation sheets.
• ● Funding source works as both a field and an audit dimension, with Title I and E-Rate named, plus e-signatures for agreements, AUPs, handbooks, and insurance forms, and scheduled report email delivery.

What to check before you buy

• No purchase order or receiving workflow. The asset record carries passive procurement metadata such as vendor details and purchase dates, but there is no PO object, approval routing, or receive-against-PO step.

  Basis: verified three ways — no PO page, no site search hit, and absent from the vendor's own module overview

• No parent-facing portal. Families are reached by email — invoices are delivered with view tracking — and when a family pays, that happens on the third-party processor's site rather than in One to One Plus. A staff and student self-service ticket portal does exist; the gap is specifically family-facing.

  Basis: vendor invoices and payments documentation describes email delivery plus third-party payment

• No Clever, ClassLink, or OneRoster support is listed among their published integrations — rostering runs through direct per-vendor SIS connectors instead.

  Basis: vendor integrations page, which names no rostering standard or roster broker

• Payment collection is entirely third-party — MySchoolBucks and Rycor are the named processors — so the fee record and the money live in different systems.

  Basis: vendor integrations and payments pages name MySchoolBucks and Rycor

• Warranty data is stored on the asset record, but no claim workflow, expiration alerting, or vendor RMA process is documented.

  Basis: vendor asset management documentation treats warranty as an asset attribute

• Reporting depth is a recurring theme in reviewer feedback despite the product shipping a report builder — buyers appear to judge this area harshly.

  Basis: recurring theme in public review-site feedback

• Hosted SaaS only — there is no self-hosted or on-premises option and no source availability.

  Basis: vendor sells a hosted subscription with no self-host offering published

• MDM integration is ingest-oriented: device data is imported and kept in sync, with no documented reviewed write-back of OU moves, disables, or deprovisions into Google Admin.

  Basis: vendor integrations page describes device data being imported, updated, and synced into the platform

How Chalk compares with One to One Plus →

The third option: Chalk

If you are weighing GLPI against One to One Plus, Chalk belongs on the same shortlist. It is the open-source K-12 IT stack: device inventory that fills itself in from Google Admin, Intune, and Jamf against a roster synced from your SIS, a 1:1 circulation desk with agreements and fees, repairs with parts and costs, a help desk that already knows who is asking, and a built-in SAML/OIDC identity provider.

• ✓ Self-host it free forever under AGPL-3.0 — the entire feature set, one binary, your infrastructure — or use the hosted version, priced by fleet size with no per-seat or per-student fees and the price ladder published.
• ✓ Built only for K-12: students, buildings, custody, funding sources, and ChromeOS auto-update expiration are native concepts, not custom fields.
• ✓ Writes back to Google Admin as a reviewed diff — every OU move, disable, and deprovision previewed before it executes — and serves a OneRoster 1.1 API so other district systems can pull the roster from Chalk.
• ✓ Fees are assessed and tracked without touching payment cards, keeping the asset system out of your PCI scope.