Freshdesk vs GLPI

Freshdesk

Freshworks' customer-support help desk — the half of the catalog with no asset management at all, often bought by districts who meant to buy Freshservice.

Where Freshdesk is strong

• ● Very fast to stand up. A district can go from a shared inbox to a real queue with SLAs, automations, and a branded portal in an afternoon, with no server and no consultant.
• ● Genuinely good ticketing fundamentals: email-to-ticket, self-service portal, knowledge base with versioning and multilingual articles, SLA policies with escalation, time- and event-triggered automations, and custom dashboards.
• ● The omnichannel track is broad for the money — WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, Instagram, LINE, Microsoft Teams, and Slack alongside email and chat.
• ● Freddy AI Copilot and AI Agent are real, shipping capabilities for deflection and agent assistance, with 500 agent sessions included on paid plans before metering starts.
• ● A well-documented REST API covering tickets, contacts, agents, knowledge base articles, satisfaction ratings, custom objects, and time entries, plus a marketplace of prebuilt apps.
• ● Day passes let an occasional agent — a building tech who works two tickets a week — be covered for $2 to $12 instead of a full seat.

What to check before you buy

• Freshdesk has no asset management, no CMDB, no change management, and no ITIL process at all. That is not an oversight — it is a customer-support product, and Freshworks sells IT asset management in a different product entirely.

  Basis: Freshworks' own Freshdesk-versus-Freshservice comparison page positions Freshdesk for 'customer service' and Freshservice for 'ITSM, ITOM, and ITAM.' No asset or CMDB feature appears on any Freshdesk page.

• Getting tickets and Chromebook inventory from Freshworks means buying two products. Freshservice is a separate per-agent subscription with its own asset-unit metering, so the district ends up with two bills and two systems that do not share a record.

  Basis: Freshworks sells and prices Freshdesk and Freshservice separately; Freshservice's own pricing meters ITAM asset units apart from agent seats.

• No SIS or rostering integration — no OneRoster, Clever, ClassLink, PowerSchool, Infinite Campus, or Skyward — and no student, guardian, or family concepts. The end-user primitive is a CRM-style contact.

  Basis: None are advertised in the Freshworks app marketplace for Freshdesk, whose listed apps are general business tools. Treat as 'none published' rather than proven absent — the marketplace search is client-side and not fully crawlable.

• No 1:1 device custody anywhere in the product: no check-out to a student, no due dates, no overdue handling, no parent-signed agreement, no loaner pool, no lost or stolen lifecycle, and no damage fees.

  Basis: All absent from the Freshdesk feature pages, which cover channels, ticketing, knowledge, and reporting only.

• The free plan is no longer a durable option. It is capped at two agents, expires after six months, and is excluded from the omnichannel track — so a district that starts free has a clock running.

  Basis: Freshworks' own support article on the Freshdesk free program states the two-agent limit, the six-month duration, and the exclusion from the omnichannel product.

• Getting chat and social costs roughly $10 to $30 more per agent per month than the headline, because they live on a separate product track rather than a higher tier of the same one.

  Basis: Freshworks publishes two pricing pages: the Freshdesk track at $19/$55/$89 and the omnichannel track at $29/$79/$119.

• End-user portal SSO is gated to the Pro and Enterprise tiers. A district on the entry plan cannot sign staff or students into the self-service portal with district credentials at all.

  Basis: Freshworks' documentation on custom portal SSO policies lists the capability as available on Pro and Enterprise on both tracks.

• It consumes SSO but is not an identity provider. It accepts SAML, OAuth 2.0, OIDC, and JWT from your IdP; it cannot issue identity to your other vendors or give students a portal identity of their own.

  Basis: Freshworks' SSO documentation describes Freshdesk as a service provider configured against an external IdP such as Entra, Okta, or Google.

How Chalk compares with Freshdesk →

GLPI

The one product in this comparison that shares Chalk's whole premise — free, open source, self-hostable, with a real ITIL service desk attached to a real asset inventory — and none of its K-12 model.

Where GLPI is strong

• ● Genuinely free and genuinely open: GPL-3.0 on GitHub, downloadable and self-hostable with no license fee, no crippled community edition, and two decades of production use behind it.
• ● A full ITIL service desk — tickets, problems and changes, with planning, statistics and dashboards — sitting on the same database as the asset inventory rather than integrated with it.
• ● Very broad inventory coverage: computers, monitors, software, network equipment, printers, phones, cartridges, consumables, SIM cards, cables, PDUs and datacenter infrastructure, plus a CMDB over the relationships between them.
• ● Financial management most asset trackers do not attempt — budgets, contracts, suppliers and license tracking as first-class objects, so the cost side of the estate lives with the asset side.
• ● GLPI Agent does automated inventory across platforms, so hardware and software data arrives without anyone typing serial numbers.
• ● A multi-entity model with granular profiles and access control that maps naturally onto a district of many schools, plus a large plugin ecosystem — and both deployment shapes are real and priced openly, self-hosted or hosted GLPI Network at a published per-user rate.

What to check before you buy

• The free download and the product Teclib' sells are not the same surface. OAuth SSO, SCIM, GLPI AI, the advanced dashboard and whole tiers of official plugins are bundled into paid GLPI Network subscriptions.

  Basis: Vendor pricing page lists these as contents of the Basic, Standard and Advanced subscription tiers.

• Self-hosted support starts at €100 per month even for a small installation, and the meter is IT agents — the technicians who answer tickets — with tiers stepping to €300, €1,000 and €4,500 per month.

  Basis: Vendor pricing page, self-hosted subscription tiers with per-tier agent limits.

• It is a general ITIL tool with no K-12 model: no student, guardian or enrollment concepts, and no SIS or rostering connectors — no OneRoster, Clever, ClassLink, PowerSchool, Infinite Campus or Skyward. Students arrive by import.

  Basis: Absent from GLPI's published feature set, which describes users, groups and entities rather than students.

• No 1:1 circulation machinery. GLPI can reserve and assign equipment, but there is no student device agreement, no parent e-signature, no overdue on a school-year loan, no damage fee and no family balance.

  Basis: Absent from the vendor's documented modules, which cover assets, helpdesk, CMDB and financial management.

• No ChromeOS story. Inventory comes from GLPI Agent and network scanning; Google Admin, Intune and Jamf ingest are plugin or integration territory rather than documented core modules, and there is no ChromeOS AUE surface.

  Basis: Core inventory is documented as GLPI Agent-driven; no first-party MDM connector appears in the published feature list.

• It is not an identity provider. GLPI authenticates against directories and external providers — and OAuth SSO is itself a subscription plugin — rather than issuing SAML or OIDC to your other vendors.

  Basis: Vendor pricing page lists OAuth SSO and SCIM as plugins included with paid subscriptions, positioning GLPI as the consumer of identity.

• Self-hosting GLPI is a PHP and database deployment plus agent rollout that you patch and upgrade yourself, unless you buy a subscription or engage a partner. That is a real operations line, not a download.

  Basis: GLPI is distributed as a PHP application released on GitHub with a separately versioned GLPI Agent; the vendor routes implementation through its partner network.

• Pricing, documentation and support are anchored to a European vendor and priced in euros, so a US district is usually buying implementation through a partner rather than from the vendor directly.

  Basis: Vendor site publishes euro pricing and directs implementation to its Platinum Partner network.

How Chalk compares with GLPI →

The third option: Chalk

If you are weighing Freshdesk against GLPI, Chalk belongs on the same shortlist. It is the open-source K-12 IT stack: device inventory that fills itself in from Google Admin, Intune, and Jamf against a roster synced from your SIS, a 1:1 circulation desk with agreements and fees, repairs with parts and costs, a help desk that already knows who is asking, and a built-in SAML/OIDC identity provider.

• ✓ Self-host it free forever under AGPL-3.0 — the entire feature set, one binary, your infrastructure — or use the hosted version, priced by fleet size with no per-seat or per-student fees and the price ladder published.
• ✓ Built only for K-12: students, buildings, custody, funding sources, and ChromeOS auto-update expiration are native concepts, not custom fields.
• ✓ Writes back to Google Admin as a reviewed diff — every OU move, disable, and deprovision previewed before it executes — and serves a OneRoster 1.1 API so other district systems can pull the roster from Chalk.
• ✓ Fees are assessed and tracked without touching payment cards, keeping the asset system out of your PCI scope.