Chalk

Comparison

AssetTiger vs SysAid

Two tools districts shortlist for device tracking and IT operations, compared the way a buying committee actually reads them: what each is, what each does well, and what to check before signing. We build Chalk, a third option in this space — that context is worth knowing as you read, and it is why every claim below carries its basis.

AssetTiger

The cheapest per-asset tracker a district will find, with no feature gating and unlimited users — and no ticketing, no roster, and no way to see a Chromebook that did not arrive on a spreadsheet.

Pricing: Subscription metered purely on asset count across published tiers, with unlimited users on every paid plan and yearly billing discounted against monthly — the vendor's own framing is 'pay for assets, not seats.' Stock inventory is a separate small add-on. Note a correction to widely repeated third-party claims: the free plan is now a 30-day trial capped at 250 assets and two users, after which the account becomes view-only. It is not free forever. The pricing FAQ raises the question of school and nonprofit discounts; we could not read the answer, so ask them directly.

Where AssetTiger is strong

  • The lowest per-asset cost in this comparison by a wide margin, on a clean single meter.
  • No feature gating between paid tiers — the vendor states explicitly that you upgrade to track more assets, not to unlock capabilities. That is unusually honest packaging and worth conceding.
  • Unlimited users on every paid plan, so every building secretary and tech can have an account for free.
  • Native iOS and Android apps with barcode and QR scanning, plus label printing from any printer — from a company whose main business is asset tags.
  • Check-in and check-out with due dates and overdue alerts, which is more custody machinery than most trackers at this price.
  • Deep reporting for the category — a large library of report types and a very granular permission model.

What to check before you buy

  • No ticketing or help desk of any kind, and no connectors to one. A district running AssetTiger buys or keeps a separate service desk, and the two never see each other.

    Basis: No ticketing capability or integration appears anywhere in AssetTiger's feature list.

  • No MDM or device-management ingest at all — nothing pulls from Google Admin, Intune, or Jamf. Every Chromebook enters by CSV import or by hand, and nothing detects a device you did not know about.

    Basis: AssetTiger publishes no MDM connectors; this is the largest functional gap for a Chromebook district.

  • No SIS or rostering integration — no OneRoster, Clever, ClassLink, or PowerSchool — and no student, guardian, or family concepts. Nothing notices a transfer or a withdrawal.

    Basis: None appear in AssetTiger's features or integration documentation.

  • No parent e-signature on a device agreement and no student fee assessment or family balances, so damage at collection time is handled outside the system.

    Basis: Absent from AssetTiger's documented feature set.

  • Fund tracking exists, but it is generic budget allocation rather than grant-program aware — it will not produce the ESSER, Title, or E-Rate attribution an audit asks for without you building the structure by hand.

    Basis: AssetTiger lists a fund-tracking feature with a per-plan cap; no grant-program or funding-source-restriction concepts are documented.

  • The weakest identity story in this comparison: two-factor plus Google SSO only, with no evidence of SAML support, and certainly no ability to act as an identity provider itself.

    Basis: AssetTiger's feature list names 2FA and Google SSO; no SAML or OIDC support is documented.

  • The free plan is a 30-day trial, not a free tier. After it lapses the account is view-only, and it is limited to two users during the trial.

    Basis: AssetTiger's pricing table labels that column a free 30-day trial; third-party review sites still repeat a legacy free-forever claim that the vendor's page contradicts.

  • Stock inventory is a separate paid add-on, and there is no documented link between it and repair records, so consuming a part against a specific repair is not a supported workflow.

    Basis: Inventory is listed and priced as an add-on; no repair-to-parts linkage appears in the documentation.

How Chalk compares with AssetTiger →

SysAid

A capable ITSM suite with real asset discovery and a working Chromebook sync — priced at $89 per agent, positioned at universities rather than districts, and quietly steering its on-premises line toward the exit.

Pricing: SysAid publishes one price: Professional at $89 per agent per month, which includes 250 managed assets, the AI Copilot for agents and end users, 100,000 automation credits, and two-year retention. Enterprise is custom, starts at 20 agents, and adds sandbox, advanced BI, and longer retention. Patch management is an add-on. Everything else — assets beyond 250, on-premises deployment, education pricing — is quote-only; SysAid's own FAQ still says price depends on administrator count, assets, modules, edition, and deployment platform. For a district the per-agent axis is not the problem: SysAid states end users are unlimited, so six technicians is six seats. The asset axis is the problem, because 250 included assets is two carts. No education discount is published on any SysAid page; third-party sites assert one exists, which we cannot verify.

Where SysAid is strong

  • A full ITSM process set for the price: incident, request, problem, and change management, SLAs, a self-service portal, knowledge base, workflow automation, dashboards, and a developer API.
  • Genuine IT asset management, not a bolt-on — automatic network discovery, hardware and software inventory, a CMDB with configuration-item relationship mapping, software license management with renewal reminders, patch deployment, and remote control through Splashtop.
  • A real Chromebook integration that pulls from Google Workspace: model, serial, Chrome version, enrollment time, warranty expiry, asset ID, organizational unit, policy sync status, and CPU, memory, and disk. Most general-purpose help desks have nothing like it.
  • SysAid Copilot is included in the published tier rather than sold as a per-agent add-on, covering both agent assistance and an end-user chatbot grounded on your tickets, knowledge base, and documents.
  • Strong independent review standing — 4.5 out of 5 across 522 Capterra reviews, with automation, integrated asset management, and responsive support named repeatedly as strengths.
  • SysAid handled its 2023 zero-day well: it learned of the issue on 2 November, published an advisory with indicators of compromise on 8 November, and shipped a fixed release. That is the behavior you want from a vendor.

What to check before you buy

  • 250 managed assets are included at $89 per agent. A 1:1 district counts devices in the thousands, so the fleet becomes a negotiated line item immediately — the one axis a district has most of.

    Basis: SysAid's pricing page lists 'Managed assets (250 included)' under the Professional plan, with no published rate for additional assets.

  • The education positioning is higher education, not K-12. The customer logos on both education pages are universities, and the claims are framed around students, faculty, and campus asset variety.

    Basis: SysAid's higher-education and service-desk-for-education pages name University of Michigan, University of Toronto, Queen's University, and University of West London. Neither page mentions school districts.

  • No SIS or rostering integration — no OneRoster, Clever, ClassLink, PowerSchool, Infinite Campus, or Skyward — and no student or guardian data model. Identity sync is enterprise-shaped: Entra, Google Workspace, Okta, ADFS, CAS, Shibboleth, OneLogin.

    Basis: None appear on either education page or in SysAid's integration catalog; the user repositories SysAid documents are corporate directories.

  • The Chromebook integration reads, it does not write, and its user handling is shallow — it maps the most recent recent-user into an Owner field. There is no OU move, no disable, no deprovision, and no annotated-field write-back.

    Basis: SysAid's own Chromebook documentation describes a one-way pull from Google Workspace inventory and the recent-user-to-Owner mapping; the catalog entry is titled Chromebook (Beta).

  • No device check-out to a person as a transaction. Ownership is a synced field, not a custody event, so there are no due dates, no overdue list, no parent-signed agreement, no loaner pool, no lost or stolen lifecycle, and no damage fees.

    Basis: None of those concepts appear anywhere in SysAid's asset management documentation or marketing.

  • On-premises is no longer marketed, and its feature set is visibly thinner. SysAid's own cloud-versus-on-premises comparison documents no Teams integration, no Power BI extract, no Zapier, no SSO connector, no sandbox, and mobile at extra cost — with releases two to three times a year against fortnightly on cloud.

    Basis: SysAid's published cloud-vs-on-prem comparison PDF; its on-premises plan URL now redirects to cloud pricing. We could not verify whether a new on-premises license can still be purchased — treat it as unmarketed rather than proven discontinued.

  • That matters because the security history sits on the self-hosted line, where SysAid's own document says security updates are manual and performed by the customer. CVE-2023-47246 was a critical remote-code-execution flaw in SysAid On-Premise, exploited in the wild and added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog; three XXE flaws in 2025 followed, two of which also reached that catalog.

    Basis: NVD entries for CVE-2023-47246 and CVE-2025-2775, CISA KEV listings, SysAid's own advisory, and Rapid7's analysis. Fair reading: SysAid patched each promptly, and security press reports no public exploitation of the 2025 XXE issues — the durable point is patch cadence and who is responsible for applying it, not that the product is insecure.

  • Recurring review themes are consistent: an interface described as dated and not very intuitive, configuration of advanced automation that is time-consuming for new administrators, and built-in reporting that most reviewers end up customizing.

    Basis: Capterra's aggregated review themes across 522 SysAid reviews. G2, TrustRadius, and Gartner Peer Insights block automated reading, so no rating from those sites is cited here.

How Chalk compares with SysAid →

The third option: Chalk

If you are weighing AssetTiger against SysAid, Chalk belongs on the same shortlist. It is the open-source K-12 IT stack: device inventory that fills itself in from Google Admin, Intune, and Jamf against a roster synced from your SIS, a 1:1 circulation desk with agreements and fees, repairs with parts and costs, a help desk that already knows who is asking, and a built-in SAML/OIDC identity provider.

  • Self-host it free forever under AGPL-3.0 — the entire feature set, one binary, your infrastructure — or use the hosted version, priced by fleet size with no per-seat or per-student fees and the price ladder published.
  • Built only for K-12: students, buildings, custody, funding sources, and ChromeOS auto-update expiration are native concepts, not custom fields.
  • Writes back to Google Admin as a reviewed diff — every OU move, disable, and deprovision previewed before it executes — and serves a OneRoster 1.1 API so other district systems can pull the roster from Chalk.
  • Fees are assessed and tracked without touching payment cards, keeping the asset system out of your PCI scope.
Chalk vs AssetTiger → Chalk vs SysAid →

See all three on your own roster.

Chalk installs to a populated inventory in about 30 minutes. Self-host free under AGPL-3.0, or let us run it — priced by fleet size, never per seat.

See pricing Self-host on GitHub