Chalk

Comparison

AssetTiger vs Reftab

Two tools districts shortlist for device tracking and IT operations, compared the way a buying committee actually reads them: what each is, what each does well, and what to check before signing. We build Chalk, a third option in this space — that context is worth knowing as you read, and it is why every claim below carries its basis.

AssetTiger

The cheapest per-asset tracker a district will find, with no feature gating and unlimited users — and no ticketing, no roster, and no way to see a Chromebook that did not arrive on a spreadsheet.

Pricing: Subscription metered purely on asset count across published tiers, with unlimited users on every paid plan and yearly billing discounted against monthly — the vendor's own framing is 'pay for assets, not seats.' Stock inventory is a separate small add-on. Note a correction to widely repeated third-party claims: the free plan is now a 30-day trial capped at 250 assets and two users, after which the account becomes view-only. It is not free forever. The pricing FAQ raises the question of school and nonprofit discounts; we could not read the answer, so ask them directly.

Where AssetTiger is strong

  • The lowest per-asset cost in this comparison by a wide margin, on a clean single meter.
  • No feature gating between paid tiers — the vendor states explicitly that you upgrade to track more assets, not to unlock capabilities. That is unusually honest packaging and worth conceding.
  • Unlimited users on every paid plan, so every building secretary and tech can have an account for free.
  • Native iOS and Android apps with barcode and QR scanning, plus label printing from any printer — from a company whose main business is asset tags.
  • Check-in and check-out with due dates and overdue alerts, which is more custody machinery than most trackers at this price.
  • Deep reporting for the category — a large library of report types and a very granular permission model.

What to check before you buy

  • No ticketing or help desk of any kind, and no connectors to one. A district running AssetTiger buys or keeps a separate service desk, and the two never see each other.

    Basis: No ticketing capability or integration appears anywhere in AssetTiger's feature list.

  • No MDM or device-management ingest at all — nothing pulls from Google Admin, Intune, or Jamf. Every Chromebook enters by CSV import or by hand, and nothing detects a device you did not know about.

    Basis: AssetTiger publishes no MDM connectors; this is the largest functional gap for a Chromebook district.

  • No SIS or rostering integration — no OneRoster, Clever, ClassLink, or PowerSchool — and no student, guardian, or family concepts. Nothing notices a transfer or a withdrawal.

    Basis: None appear in AssetTiger's features or integration documentation.

  • No parent e-signature on a device agreement and no student fee assessment or family balances, so damage at collection time is handled outside the system.

    Basis: Absent from AssetTiger's documented feature set.

  • Fund tracking exists, but it is generic budget allocation rather than grant-program aware — it will not produce the ESSER, Title, or E-Rate attribution an audit asks for without you building the structure by hand.

    Basis: AssetTiger lists a fund-tracking feature with a per-plan cap; no grant-program or funding-source-restriction concepts are documented.

  • The weakest identity story in this comparison: two-factor plus Google SSO only, with no evidence of SAML support, and certainly no ability to act as an identity provider itself.

    Basis: AssetTiger's feature list names 2FA and Google SSO; no SAML or OIDC support is documented.

  • The free plan is a 30-day trial, not a free tier. After it lapses the account is view-only, and it is limited to two users during the trial.

    Basis: AssetTiger's pricing table labels that column a free 30-day trial; third-party review sites still repeat a legacy free-forever claim that the vendor's page contradicts.

  • Stock inventory is a separate paid add-on, and there is no documented link between it and repair records, so consuming a part against a specific repair is not a supported workflow.

    Basis: Inventory is listed and priced as an add-on; no repair-to-parts linkage appears in the documentation.

How Chalk compares with AssetTiger →

Reftab

A well-designed asset tracker with a real free-forever tier, self-serve signup, and no sales call — and, like the rest of its class, no help desk, no roster, and no student.

Pricing: Subscription metered per asset, with unlimited platform users on every tier and an annual-billing discount. There is a genuine free-forever tier capped at a small asset count that still includes unlimited custom fields and locations, reservations, mobile apps, barcodes, and check-in/check-out. Paid tiers add capability in layers: SSO and two-factor at the entry paid tier, signature capture and consumables above it, and the MDM, vendor, and identity-provisioning integrations only at the top tier. Software management is priced separately per tracked user. Signup is self-serve with no demo gate. The pricing FAQ raises the question of education and nonprofit discounts; we could not read the answer, so ask them directly.

Where Reftab is strong

  • The only genuinely free-forever tier in this comparison, and a generous one — unlimited custom fields and locations, reservations with calendars, advanced reports with export, mobile apps, and barcode check-in/check-out at no cost.
  • SSO and two-factor authentication at the lowest paid tier rather than gated to enterprise, which is unusual and district-friendly.
  • Unlimited platform users on every tier, so the bill never grows because you added staff.
  • Native iOS and Android apps with barcode scanning, plus a barcode designer and custom email templates.
  • Strong MDM breadth at the top tier — Intune, Jamf Pro and Jamf School, Kandji, Mosyle, NinjaOne, FleetDM, and Apple Business Manager — plus vendor warranty sync from Dell, CDW, Lenovo, and Apple.
  • A Google Workspace integration that imports Chromebooks and mobile devices daily, with configurable field mapping and optional auto-assignment to the Google-assigned user.

What to check before you buy

  • No native help desk or ticketing with SLAs. Jira Cloud and Zendesk connectors exist to surface assets on someone else's ticket, and they are top-tier features — so a district buys a service desk separately either way.

    Basis: Reftab's integration listing offers Jira and Zendesk plugins rather than native ticketing; no SLA capability appears in any tier.

  • No SIS or rostering integration — no OneRoster, Clever, ClassLink, or PowerSchool — and no student, guardian, or family concepts. Nothing reacts to a transfer, a withdrawal, or grade rollover.

    Basis: None appear in Reftab's integration catalog or documentation; the identity integrations are corporate directories.

  • Signature capture is staff-side custody acknowledgement, not a parent or guardian e-signature on a device agreement, and it sits behind a mid-tier upgrade.

    Basis: Reftab lists signature capture as a Pro-tier feature; no guardian entity or agreement workflow exists in the data model.

  • No student fee assessment and no family balances, so damage recovered at collection time is tracked outside the system.

    Basis: Absent from Reftab's documented feature set across all tiers.

  • No funding-source or grant tracking for ESSER, Title, or E-Rate attribution.

    Basis: No funding-source dimension appears in Reftab's documentation.

  • ChromeOS support is import only and syncs once daily. Nothing writes back, so OU moves and disabling a stolen Chromebook remain manual work in Google Admin.

    Basis: Reftab's Google Workspace integration guide documents a daily one-way import with field mapping; no write-back is described.

  • The MDM connectors that make the inventory self-maintaining — Intune, Jamf, Kandji, Mosyle, Apple Business Manager — are all top-tier features, which is a meaningful jump from the tier where SSO lives.

    Basis: Reftab's pricing page places all MDM, vendor, and IdP integrations at the Business tier.

  • It consumes SSO but is not an identity provider. Okta, Entra ID, SAML 2.0, SCIM, and LDAP are identity it reads, not identity it issues — and the IdP user-provisioning integrations are top-tier only.

    Basis: Reftab is configured as a service provider against an external IdP; provisioning integrations are listed at the Business tier.

How Chalk compares with Reftab →

The third option: Chalk

If you are weighing AssetTiger against Reftab, Chalk belongs on the same shortlist. It is the open-source K-12 IT stack: device inventory that fills itself in from Google Admin, Intune, and Jamf against a roster synced from your SIS, a 1:1 circulation desk with agreements and fees, repairs with parts and costs, a help desk that already knows who is asking, and a built-in SAML/OIDC identity provider.

  • Self-host it free forever under AGPL-3.0 — the entire feature set, one binary, your infrastructure — or use the hosted version, priced by fleet size with no per-seat or per-student fees and the price ladder published.
  • Built only for K-12: students, buildings, custody, funding sources, and ChromeOS auto-update expiration are native concepts, not custom fields.
  • Writes back to Google Admin as a reviewed diff — every OU move, disable, and deprovision previewed before it executes — and serves a OneRoster 1.1 API so other district systems can pull the roster from Chalk.
  • Fees are assessed and tracked without touching payment cards, keeping the asset system out of your PCI scope.
Chalk vs AssetTiger → Chalk vs Reftab →

See all three on your own roster.

Chalk installs to a populated inventory in about 30 minutes. Self-host free under AGPL-3.0, or let us run it — priced by fleet size, never per seat.

See pricing Self-host on GitHub