Comparison

AssetTiger vs EZOfficeInventory

Two tools districts shortlist for device tracking and IT operations, compared the way a buying committee actually reads them: what each is, what each does well, and what to check before signing. We build Chalk, a third option in this space — that context is worth knowing as you read, and it is why every claim below carries its basis.

AssetTiger

The cheapest per-asset tracker a district will find, with no feature gating and unlimited users — and no ticketing, no roster, and no way to see a Chromebook that did not arrive on a spreadsheet.

Pricing: Subscription metered purely on asset count across published tiers, with unlimited users on every paid plan and yearly billing discounted against monthly — the vendor's own framing is 'pay for assets, not seats.' Stock inventory is a separate small add-on. Note a correction to widely repeated third-party claims: the free plan is now a 30-day trial capped at 250 assets and two users, after which the account becomes view-only. It is not free forever. The pricing FAQ raises the question of school and nonprofit discounts; we could not read the answer, so ask them directly.

Where AssetTiger is strong

  • The lowest per-asset cost in this comparison by a wide margin, on a clean single meter.
  • No feature gating between paid tiers — the vendor states explicitly that you upgrade to track more assets, not to unlock capabilities. That is unusually honest packaging and worth conceding.
  • Unlimited users on every paid plan, so every building secretary and tech can have an account for free.
  • Native iOS and Android apps with barcode and QR scanning, plus label printing from any printer — from a company whose main business is asset tags.
  • Check-in and check-out with due dates and overdue alerts, which is more custody machinery than most trackers at this price.
  • Deep reporting for the category — a large library of report types and a very granular permission model.

What to check before you buy

  • No ticketing or help desk of any kind, and no connectors to one. A district running AssetTiger buys or keeps a separate service desk, and the two never see each other.

    Basis: No ticketing capability or integration appears anywhere in AssetTiger's feature list.

  • No MDM or device-management ingest at all — nothing pulls from Google Admin, Intune, or Jamf. Every Chromebook enters by CSV import or by hand, and nothing detects a device you did not know about.

    Basis: AssetTiger publishes no MDM connectors; this is the largest functional gap for a Chromebook district.

  • No SIS or rostering integration — no OneRoster, Clever, ClassLink, or PowerSchool — and no student, guardian, or family concepts. Nothing notices a transfer or a withdrawal.

    Basis: None appear in AssetTiger's features or integration documentation.

  • No parent e-signature on a device agreement and no student fee assessment or family balances, so damage at collection time is handled outside the system.

    Basis: Absent from AssetTiger's documented feature set.

  • Fund tracking exists, but it is generic budget allocation rather than grant-program aware — it will not produce the ESSER, Title, or E-Rate attribution an audit asks for without you building the structure by hand.

    Basis: AssetTiger lists a fund-tracking feature with a per-plan cap; no grant-program or funding-source-restriction concepts are documented.

  • The weakest identity story in this comparison: two-factor plus Google SSO only, with no evidence of SAML support, and certainly no ability to act as an identity provider itself.

    Basis: AssetTiger's feature list names 2FA and Google SSO; no SAML or OIDC support is documented.

  • The free plan is a 30-day trial, not a free tier. After it lapses the account is view-only, and it is limited to two users during the trial.

    Basis: AssetTiger's pricing table labels that column a free 30-day trial; third-party review sites still repeat a legacy free-forever claim that the vendor's page contradicts.

  • Stock inventory is a separate paid add-on, and there is no documented link between it and repair records, so consuming a part against a specific repair is not a supported workflow.

    Basis: Inventory is listed and priced as an add-on; no repair-to-parts linkage appears in the documentation.

How Chalk compares with AssetTiger →

EZOfficeInventory

A capable commercial asset tracker with the deepest MDM connector list in its class — and, like the rest of that class, no roster, no student, and no write-back.

Pricing: Subscription priced per tracked item, quoted from an item-count slider across published Essential, Advanced, and Premium tiers, with Enterprise quote-only. Users are advertised as unlimited, subject to a fair-use asterisk, so the meter is your fleet rather than your staff. There is no free tier — only a time-limited trial. EZO's IT-asset variant, AssetSonar, is a separate product priced per asset per month, with ITSM ticketing sold as a higher per-asset rate and advanced software asset management as a further add-on. EZO's dedicated K-12 landing page is no longer live, and no education discount is published.

Where EZOfficeInventory is strong

  • The deepest device-ingest integration list of the commercial asset trackers — Intune, Jamf Pro, Kandji, Mosyle, SCCM, Workspace ONE, JumpCloud, Meraki, Apple Business Manager, and Google Endpoint Management for ChromeOS.
  • Warranty details sync automatically from manufacturers including Dell and Lenovo, and procurement data can sync from CDW — genuinely less manual data entry than most.
  • Native iOS and Android apps with barcode and QR scanning, on every tier.
  • Real checkout, reservation, and audit workflows, with custom fields, purchase orders, and RFID support at the middle tier.
  • Unlimited users at every tier, so adding technicians or building staff does not change the bill.
  • AssetSonar's ITSM tier includes genuine ticketing with SLA management, a knowledge base, and a service catalog — the only product in this asset-tracker group with native SLAs.

What to check before you buy

  • The base product has no ticketing at all. Native help desk with SLAs exists only in AssetSonar's ITSM tier — a different product at a higher per-asset rate — so a district gets either the asset tracker or a second contract.

    Basis: EZOfficeInventory offers Jira and Zendesk connectors rather than native ticketing; SLA management appears in AssetSonar's ITSM pricing tier.

  • No SIS or rostering integration — no OneRoster, Clever, ClassLink, or PowerSchool anywhere in the connector catalog. Students arrive by CSV.

    Basis: None appear in EZO's full published integration list, which covers MDM, identity, and procurement systems only.

  • No student, guardian, or family concepts, and therefore nothing that notices a transfer, a withdrawal, or grade rollover.

    Basis: Absent from the product's data model, which tracks items and users.

  • No parent e-signature on a device agreement, no student fee assessment, and no family balances.

    Basis: Absent from EZO's documented feature set.

  • No funding-source or grant tracking for ESSER, Title, or E-Rate reporting.

    Basis: No funding-source dimension appears in the product documentation.

  • ChromeOS support is import only. The Google Endpoint Management connector is described as importing ChromeOS and mobile data; nothing writes back, so OU moves and disabling a stolen Chromebook stay manual in Google Admin.

    Basis: EZO's integration listing describes the connector as importing ChromeOS and mobile data into AssetSonar, with no write-back claimed.

  • It consumes SSO but is not an identity provider — Entra ID, Okta with SCIM, OneLogin, and Ping are identity sources it reads, not identity it issues.

    Basis: EZO's identity integrations are configured as a service provider against an external IdP.

  • Maintenance is a separate paid CMMS add-on even on the top tier, so repairs that draw parts out of stock are not simply included.

    Basis: EZO CMMS is listed as an add-on alongside the Premium tier and sold as its own product.

How Chalk compares with EZOfficeInventory →

The third option: Chalk

If you are weighing AssetTiger against EZOfficeInventory, Chalk belongs on the same shortlist. It is the open-source K-12 IT stack: device inventory that fills itself in from Google Admin, Intune, and Jamf against a roster synced from your SIS, a 1:1 circulation desk with agreements and fees, repairs with parts and costs, a help desk that already knows who is asking, and a built-in SAML/OIDC identity provider.

  • Self-host it free forever under AGPL-3.0 — the entire feature set, one binary, your infrastructure — or use the hosted version, priced by fleet size with no per-seat or per-student fees and the price ladder published.
  • Built only for K-12: students, buildings, custody, funding sources, and ChromeOS auto-update expiration are native concepts, not custom fields.
  • Writes back to Google Admin as a reviewed diff — every OU move, disable, and deprovision previewed before it executes — and serves a OneRoster 1.1 API so other district systems can pull the roster from Chalk.
  • Fees are assessed and tracked without touching payment cards, keeping the asset system out of your PCI scope.

See all three on your own roster.

Chalk installs to a populated inventory in about 30 minutes. Self-host free under AGPL-3.0, or let us run it — priced by fleet size, never per seat.